Main Page | | IBR Grants | IBR Conferences | Latest Discoveries About Us | CV of IBR Members |
Interview of Sir Prof. Ruggero Maria Santilli by
YOUNG FREE FILMS, LLC
1244 Robert Court
Rupon, CA 95366
Q1: You have reached in your research history making results. It appears you have proved the prediction by Albert Einstein that holds historic importance. Could you explain in layman's works what are these historic results?
A1. Recall that quantum mechanical descriptions are dominated by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle for which the position and momentum of particles cannot be jointly determined with classical precision. In 1935, Albert Einstein published a historic paper, jointly with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR), presenting the view that "quantum mechanics is not a complete theory, " and suggesting that there could exist conditions in nature recovering classical determinism at least under certain limit conditions. These predictions are now collectively known as the "EPR argument" [1]. Following decades of research in the construction of the necessary new mathematics, today known as iso- and geno-mathematics, and the corresponding isotopic and genotopic branches of hadronic mechanics, I published in 1998 paper [2] at Acta Applicandae Mathematicae showing that extended particles in the interior of nuclei admit an equivalent classical image which is impossible for quantum mechanical point particles in vacuum. More recently, I published in 2019 at Ratio Mathematca paper [3] showing that extended particles in the interior of nuclei and stars progressively approach Einstein's determinism in a way proportional to the density of the medium. Detailed presentations of these resuts are available in Refs. [4]. By recalling that the entirety of the microscopic world is nowadays solely represented with quantum mechanics, the "completion" of quantum mechanics into the covering hadronic mechanics has possible implications in all quantitative sciences.
Q2. What is the history making announcement you are planning for this year?
A2. In the proposed International Workshop on Einstein determinism [4C] we would like to review and debate: about fifty years of research that I initiated at Harvard University in the early 1980s under DOE suppor; the construction of hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry; the apparent proofs of Einstein's predictions; and their applications particularly for the solution of our increasingly alarming environmental problems.
Q3: What brought you to your first flash of genius insight? What lead up to this onset of clarity?
A3. In 1935, the Nazis were at the peak of their military, political, as well as, mostly ignored, scientific power since quantum mechanics was conceived by German scientists such as Planck, Heisenberg, Schroedinger and others.Therefore, the 1935 paper by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen was strongly criticized by important scientists of the time, such as Niels Bohr [5] and others (see the general bibliography in Ref. [6]). During my graduate studies in physics at the University of Torino, Italy, in the mid 1960s, I studied papers in the EPR argument as part of our graduate curriculum, and did not consider valid all objections I could locate against Einstein's argument that "quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory" [6] because quantum mechanics was conceived and verified for permanently stable systems such as the structure of the hydrogen atom, which are invariant under time reversal, in the sense that their image under time reversal verifies causality laws. As such, quantum mechanics cannot provide a consistent description of all energy producing processes, whether in physics or in chemistry, because they are irreversible over time, in the sense that their time reversal image violates causality, as it is clearly the case for fossil fuel combustion whose time reversal image would imply that the exhaust should reconstruct the fuel. In this way, I reached the conviction, I hold to this day, that, even though magnificently valid for reversible systems of point-like particles in vacuum, Einstein is correct in stating that "quantum mechanics is "incomplete" in the sense that it could admit a broadening permitting a consistent treatment of irreversible events. I, therefore, decided to dedicate my research life to the "completion" of quantum mechanics into a covering theory describing irreversible systems of extended particles in general, and reversible structure of point-like particles as particular cases.
Q4. What is the most important flash of genius that lead you to generalize quantum mechanics into hadronic mechanics?
A4. I initiated my search by studying Lagrange's original papers, mostly written in Italian in the town of Torino, Italy, were he was birn. In these papers, Lagrange stressed that nature admits systems with and without a potential energy; he represented systems with a potential energy with a function today known as the Lagrangian, which is at the foundation of quantum mechanics; and he represented non-potential systems with terms external to his celebrated analytic equations. These external terms have been vastly ignored in the 20th century physics and chemistry because representing irreversibility, thus being structurally beyond any possible representation by quantum mechanics. Therefore, I decided to generalize quantum mechanics into a theory admitting a consistent classical and operator representation of Lagrange's external terms.
Q5. You have been listed by the Estonia Academy of Sciences in 1990, when still under communist regime, as one of the most important applied mathematicians of all times, jointly with Gauss ,Cayley, Fourier, and other illustrious mathematicians, for your discovery of the Lie-admissible generalization of the Lie algebras of quantum mechanics, a generalization today known as Santilli genomathematics. Can you outline in simple words this flash of genius?
A5. Quantum mechanics is based on the conventional associative product AB of numbers, functions or matrices A and B, as well as the time reversal invariant combination AB - BA, known as the Lie product, which characterizes the basic dynamical equations of quantum mechanics. My single most important idea to incorporate irreversible processes was that of generalizing the associative product AB into the form ARB where R is a fixed quantity representing Lagrange's external terms for motion forward in time, with the conjugate expression BSA where S represents Lagrange's terms for motion backward in time, resulting in the covering ARB - BSA of Lie algebras AB - BA , today known as Santilli Lie-admissible product, which guarantees irreversibility for R different than S. I therefore published in 1967 my Ph. D. Thesis presenting the first known Lie-admissible generalization of Lie algebras for irreversible systems [7] (see the recent account [8]), that was quoted by the 1990 Nomination I received from the Estonia Academy of Sciences since it implies a structural generalization of the entire 20th century applied mathematics.
Q6: What kind of verifications have continued to emerge.
A6. In particle physics, we have achieved systematic experimental confirmations of the synthesis of the neutron from the hydrogen atom [9] and industrial applications with the Directional Neutron Source (DNS) to scan baggages for concealed nuclear weapons [10]. In astrophysics we have achieved systematic experimental confirmations of the loss (acquisition) of energy of light when passing through a cold (hot) gas, with ensuing redshift (blueshift) known as isoshift that confirm Zwicky's hypothesis that galactic light loses energy to the very cold intergalactic medium without any need for the expansion of the universe [11]. In chemistry, we have achieved the first and only known attractive force between identical valence electrons with a consequential quantitative representation of molecular structures with important environmental applications for the clean combustion of fossil fuels [12]. We have also introduced the new chemical species iof magnecules [13] and provided experimental evidence on its existence [14] with industrial applications under development in various countries (see memoir [15] for a general review of experimental verifications).
Q7. We all know our increasingly alarming environmental problems caused by a disproportionate combustion of fossil fuels. Can you outline the expected contribution by hadronic mechanics to the solution of these environmental problems?
A7. There comes a time in the life of a physicist at which physical evidence has to be admitted. We have been unable to achieve the controlled fusion in seventy years of attempts and the world wide expenditure of over one billion dollars of public funds. It is time to admit that the ultimate origin of this historic failure is the inability by quantum mechanics to provide consistent predictions of new clean energies due to their irreversibility over time. According to available theoretical and experimental evidence, hadronic mechanics has allowed the identification of basically new controlled fusions [16], clean combustion of fossil fuels [17] and other forms of clean energies.
Q8. Can you outline the main flash of novelty in your controlled fusion?
A8. The reason for the impossibility to achieve the controlled fusion is that nuclei are positively charged. Consequently, nuclei experience the mutual Coulomb repulsion which is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Conventional attempt to achieve the controlled fusion are doomed to failure because, at the distance 10 -15 cm necessary for nuclear fusions, nuclei experience the astronomically big repulsive force F ≈ - 1030 N under which nuclear fusions are impossible. Additional attempts to overcome this repulsion via high energy collisions are equally doomed to failure due to known uncontrollable instabilities at high energy collisions. Our basically new approach to controlled fusion is based on the synthesis of negatively charged nuclei [10,18] that, as such are attracted at 10-15 cm mutual distance, rather than being repelled, with a force F ≈ + 1030 N, by therefore rendering the fusion unavoidable.
Q9. Your observational experiments and measurements on new controlled fusion appear to be applicable to the stimulated decay of radioactive waste. Can you relay some information on this important need of mankind?
A9. There is no doubt in my mind that, being naturally unstable, radioactive nuclei admit a stimulated decay down to mean life of the order of minutes via equipment that can be operated by nuclear power plants. To give an idea, being large, radioactive nuclei must decay according to established physical laws under the sole deformation of their shape into ellipsoids because of the ensuing dominance of opposing positive charges. The reduction of the mean life is then reduced to the intensity of the electric field. I worked feverishly at this type of nuclear waste recycling during Al Gore run for the presidency, but I had to stop because of life threats reported in the website http://www.nuclearwasterecycling.com/ apparently from industries interested in the billions of dollars expected from the storage of nuclear waste in the Jukka Mountain, storage that in reality never occurred.
Q10. On September 8, 2011, you received the honor of being knighted by the Republic of San Marino in the millenary Equestrian Order of Sant'Agata for an international conference you organized there. Can you relay some information on the content of the conference?
A10. The 2011 San Marino International Workshop was the first scientific meeting dealing with the matter as well as the antimatter component of the universe, with basic advances in each of them. For the matter component of the universe, we verified the forgotten view by Einstein, Hubble, Hoyle, Fermi, de Broglie and other illustrious scientists according to whom the universe is not expanding. The quantity we actually measure from the universe is the cosmological redshift z of galactic light which is proportional to the distance d of galaxies from Earth according to the Hubble Law z = Hd, where H is Hubble's constant. Einstein, Hubble, Hoyle, Fermi, de Broglie and other illustrious scientists died without accepting the expansion of the universe because, the interpretation of the measured redshift z = Hd with the "conjecture" of the expansion of galaxies at speed v away from us, z = v/c, implies a return to the Middle Ages with Earth at the center of the universe because the expansion would be the same for all galaxies at the distance d in all radial directions from Earth. We then presented experimental evidence on the validity of Zwicky's hypothesis of Tired Light, namely, light losing energy to the intergalactic medium [11] that represents experimental measurements without expansion of the universe. The antimatter component of the universe was introduced for the first time at the 2011 San Marino Workshop because considered non existent prior to our studies. In fact, we presented mathematical, theoretical and experimental evidence on the apparent existence of antimatter galaxies and their necessity to stabilize a non-expanding universe via matter-antimatter gravitational repulsion [19] .
Q11: Do your observational experiments and measurements on the synthesis of the neutron from the hydrogen imply a continuous creation of matter in the universe?
A11. Yes. The mass of the neutron is 0.782 MeV bigger than the sum of the masses of the electron and the proton. This "missing mass" cannot be provided by relative kinetic energy between the electron and the proton because at that energy the cross section e-p is essentially null, thus preventing any synthesis. The same goes for other orthodox conjectures. The only consistent explanation I can find is that the missing energy of 0.782 MeV originates from the ether as a universal substratum of extremely high density. Then, the only possible mechanism verifiable with experiments is that the missing energy is propagated from the ether to the neutron via longitudinal impulses I have called "etherino" [20]. the implications are far reaching because a star synthesizes 1030 neutron per seconds. or more. Therefore, there could be such a continuous creation of matter that our Sun may acquire from the ether tons of new matter per second. It should be noted that there are additional events in the universe that can only be quantitatively explained via an accretion of matter from the ether. This is the case for the energy released by a supernova which is so astronomically big to prevent explanations via nuclear fusions and other conventional processes. It appears that the missing energy of a supernova originates via the same mechanism of the creation of matter in the synthesis of the neutron.
A12. This orthodox view has no scientific foundation because there is no possibility whatsoever that we can identify the preferred reference frame at rest in the universe since the ether fills up the entire universe. Hence, the ether as a universal substratum is in no conflict whatsoever with Einstein's special relativity.
Q13: An early realization in your work was that electrons are oscillations of a point of an infinitely rigid ether. This is akin to a deep mystical description of reality, such as in the Rig Veda, where the indivisible co-presence of the immaculate emptiness, Sunyataya, with infinite oneness, Anantaya, is described. With the development of hadronic mechanics, how has this early formative insight unfolded further?
A13. I published my first scientific paper in 1956 [24] as an undergraduate student of physics, on the need for the ether as a universal substratum , and these are the main lines. Electromagnetic "waves" cannot exist without a medium creating and propagating them. Also, electromagnetic waves are transversal in the sense that oscillations occur in the direction perpendicular to that of propagation. This is solely possible if the ether has characteristics similar to our rigidity, from which the title of the paper was derived. By comparison, sound waves are longitudinal in the sense that oscillations occur in the direction of propagation because air is compressible. The fact that electromagnetic waves propagate at the incredible speed of 300,000 Km/s requires space to have an extremely big rigidity and energy content. Calculations I did later on indicated that one cubic centimeter of the ether appears to contain more energy than that contained in our entire Sun. The paper then used these features to show the lack of existence of the "ethereal wind" used in the 1950s to dismiss the ether as a universal substratum on grounds that Earth should sense a resistance in its motion within the ether, by therefore preventing its free orbiting around the Sun. My argument is that the electron has the rest energy E = 0.511 MeV that, once converted to frequency according to the quantum mechanical law E = h v/2π, yields the characteristic frequency of the electron 0.829 1020 Hz. Of course, there is no "little mass" oscillating inside the electron at that huge frequency. So, what is oscillating? The only credible answer is that 0.829 1020 Hz is the frequency of the oscillation of a point of the ether characterizing an electron at rest. So, when an electron moves, there is no motion of any mass, but the transfer of the characteristic oscillations from one point of the ether to another. Inertia is the natural "resistance" by the ether against such a propagation. Similar features can be obtained for other elementary particles and, consequently, for macroscopic masses. The thought provoking conclusion is that matter is completely empty of any conventional mass, while space is completely full of the hyperdense ether. This appears to be so to such an extent that, in the event we could stop time, the universe would completely disappear because all oscillations would stop. Yes, I agree with you that the universe has a mystical component we just cannot ignore because the complexity of nature is such that it cannot be fully grasped by our senses.
Q14. Is there any mystical aspect in your recent proof of Einstein's determinism?
A14. Yes. Experimental evidence establishes an effect called quantum entanglement according to which a particle can instantly affect the behavior of another particle at a distance. Einstein based his view that "quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory" precisely on that effect, because an instantaneous action at a distance cannot exist in nature. I achieved in Refs. [2,3] a "completion" of quantum mechanics into hadronic mechanics in such a way to achieve instantaneous action at a distance without superluminal speeds. This was done by abandoning the quantum mechanical representation of particles as point-like, and working out new mathematics called isomathematics for reversible conditions and genomathematics for irreversible events providing an invariant representation of particles as they are in nature, that is, extended and deformable. Consequently, extended particles are always in conditions of mutual penetration or overlapping and can, therefore, instantly affect each other without any need for superluminal speeds. There are a number of mystical aspects in our "completion" of quantum mechanics we should not ignore. The first is that the instantaneous entanglement at a distance is characterized by contact, thus non-potential interactions, namely, by purely ethereal interactions because they carry no potential energy at all. Another mystical aspect is technically caused by the fact that the wavepacket of one electron fills up the entire universe because, even though its intensity decreases with the inverse square of the distance, the wavepackets of one electron is identically null only at infinite distance. Consequently, the universe consists of one single entity with extended constituents all in continuous and perennial entanglement thus implying the possible existence of a kind of cosmic consciousness you have beautifully indicated in your question which cannot be readily dismissed. Numerous other mystical aspects emerge when we add antimatter and eventually consider time.
Q15: In the cosmos of hadronic mechanics, there are different possible universes that coexist within any given part of our universe, with dimensions you have defined as being a Òmulti-valued hyper dimensions,Ó can you expand on this fresh view?
A15. Thanks for this additional thought provoking question related to our studies on antimatter. Experimental evidence establishes that matter and antimatter annihilate at contact into light. This evidence can only be represented quantitatively by representing antimatter as having all characteristics opposite those of matter, with no exception. But the space tine of matter fills up the entire universe. Consequently, the spacetime of antimatter must necessarily co-exist with that of matter. the only mathematical representation I know is that the universe is a two-valued hyperstructure, in the sense that any volume in the universe has indeed three-dimensions, as perceived by our Eustachian lobes, but it is two-valued in the sense that said volume can be positive or negative [25]. I should indicate that hypermathematics is the most complex mathematics that can be conceived by the human mind precisely because it is multi-valued as indicated by the fact that the trivial unit 1 of the numeric field, dating back to biblical times, is replaced by by an ordered multi-valued set, U = {2, 5/3, 7,, ...} as a consequence of which the product of two numbers 2x3 yields the corresponding multivalued result 2x3 = {12, 10, 42, ....}. The religious, let alone mystical implications are simply beyond our imagination at this writing. Recall the need for the ether as a universal substratum with very high positive energy for the characterization and propagation of matter. But then, we have the need for a different ether necessarily having negative energy for the characterization and propagation of antimatter. As indicated earlier, the "matter-ether" must fill up the entire universe, but this must also be the case for the "antimatter-ether." It then follows that, not only matter is empty and space is full, but being the superposition of a positive and e negative ether, space has no feature, thus allowing the first known mathematical representation of the creation of the universe without any discontinuity.
Q16. What is your most important flash of intuition in chemistry?
A16. I had problems with my chemistry teacher during my graduate studies at the University of Torino, Italy, because I agree with Einstein that quantum mechanics and, therefore quantum chemistry are not "complete" theory because the two identical electrons in valence couplings should repel each other according to quantum laws and definitely cannot attract each other since they have the same negative charge. Hence, the nome of valence was for me a "nomenclature" due to the lack of the actual attractive force binding together valence electron pairs in a way compatible with experiments. The disagreement with my graduate chemistry teacher was that, in the absence of an actual attractive force in valence electron coupling, we had nol model of molecular structures. Thanks to decades of research for the prior construction of isomathematics, isomechanics and isochemistry, I was finally able to achieve the desired attractive force between valence electrons [12] and proved with Don Shillady of Virginia Commonwealth University its capability to achieve the first known exact representation of experimental data for the hydrogen [26] and water [27] molecules. In particular, the new bond, called isoelectronium, turned out to be one of the best verification of Einstein's prediction of classical determinism because any deviation from the constrained orbits of the two valence electrons would imply molecular dissociation. After, and only after achieving a quantitative model on the chemical species of molecules, I proposed the new chemical species of magnecules [13], proved its existence experimentally [14] and provided their industrial realization via the clean burning magnegas which is today sold world wide by the publicly traded U. S. company Taronis Corporation (formerly Magnegas Corporation) [30]. The aspect you may be interested in is that, despite the known strength of molecular structures we experience daily, their bond is ethereal in the above indicated sense of contact bond carrying no potential energy.
Q17: You indicated in monograph [12] that biological structures are hypermagnecules. Has this serious implications on the actual nature of our bodies and what we are?
A17. Thanks for the beautiful question which is thought provoking. There are serious indications that effective representations of the DNA require hypermathematics and hyperchemistry. In fact, the correlation of two atoms in a DNA eventually produces one human organ, such as one eye, that has 1030 atoms. But the biological notion of "correlation" between two atoms is mathematically represented by the multiplication. The clearly multi-valued character of said correlation then mandates the use of hyperstructures. The molecular content of a DNSA must the be given by hypermolecules because treated via hypermathematics. Note that, due to the extreme complexity of DNA, any attempt at deciphering their code via quantum mechanical methods is doomed to yield misconceptions at best because said methods are based on conventional numbers 1,2,3,4 etc. By comparison, hyperchemistry has a realistic chance of initiating the efforts for the deciphering of the DNA code precisely in view of its multi-valued character. The mystical aspect deserving consideration by young minds of any age is that the hyperstructural character of biological structure is immensely beyond the comparatively Lilliputian capability of our mind.
Q18. Is there any difference between molecules belonging to a biological structure and the same molecules when belonging to an inert compound? And if so, what are the mystical implications?
A18. It is my deep conviction that molecules such as water belonging to our body are different than the same molecules when in inert conditions. I indicated above the decades of research I dedicated to water which I consider the most complex molecules existing in nature. Jointly with Jeremy Dunning David of the University of Hull, England, and Richard Norman of Thunder Energies Corporation, we proposed a new structure model of the water molecule HOH [28] based on the isoelectrons [12] as valence bonds HO and OH which show the apparent capability by water to acquire a truly astronomical number of different informations which are needed, for instance, to explain the water capability of propagating for a mile the scent of blood and countless additional events. Experiments for the verification of dismissal of the new iso-HOH model were also proposed [29]. The issue raised by your question is whether, despite their large capability of acquiring different configurations, the water molecule in our body is the same as water belonging to an inanimate substance. At this point, allow me to express my religious views. I am a practicing Catholic and, as such, I believe that, not only us as humans, but all living organisms have a soul, of course proportional to the complexity of the organism. As such, I believe that the human soul is the sum of all differences betteen all atoms composing our body compared to their inanimate state.
Q19: In the hadronic sciences, in 1990, Dr Chris Illert, was able to computer simulate a large number of sea shell in their inanimate dynamics. However, traditional Euclidian mathematics failed to simulate sea shells growth because during the computer simulation of their growth they would deform and crumbled. Only with your brand new isotopic and genotypic mathematics you were able to represent sea shell growth. In particular, the representation of bifurcation s required sea shell to have an awareness of time move forward in the future, time move forward in the past, time moving backward in the future and time moving backward in the past. And these are relatively simple life forms. Are additional arrows of time required for h more complex life forms?. This has extraordinary implications on the actual nature of complex life. Does this indicate that animate complex life, like the nucleated dynamic DNA, is operating as a kind of multi-valued hyper dimensional time machine?
A19. Thank you for mentioning my friend Chris Illert for his fundamental confirmation that the share of a sea shell can be fully represented in a three-dimensional Euclidean space as done beginning with Fourier, while its growth cannot, thus requiring the multi-valued spaces of hadronic mechanics. because of this important discovery I gave to Chris Illert a 30 pounds bronze bell with his name cast on the edge for posterity during our 1995 Second International Conference on the Lie-oAdmissible Treatment of Irreversible Systems held at the Castle Prince Pignatelli, Molise, Italy. Thanks also for correctly reviewing the four different directions of time that are necessary for a sea shell to grow with correct bifurcations. Yes, you are correct in stating that "This has extraordinary implications on the actual nature of complex life." In fact, with the inclusion of time, the complexity of living organisms becomes overwhelming. I illustrate this complexity in a plenary lectures at a 2016 international meeting with the idea of the time entanglement. Recall the space entanglement of all constituents of the universe caused by their extended character, that we mentioned above. Time entanglement is the time counterpart of the space counterpart, and leads to the apparent existence in the universe of a truly universal consciousness encompassing all possible space component of the universe as well as all possible, past, present and future time evolutions. Hypermathematics, hypermechanics and hyperchemistry are the only sciences I know providing a quantitative representation of such a complexity beginning, as you correctly indicate, with the DNA.
==================
==============
Q: This brand new physics, is far from theoretical, the direct application of hypercombustion is a remarkable contribution to mankind. Now that gasoline can be immersed in the plasmatic flow reactor and have 100% clean burn, with only oxygen and nitrogen byproducts, and 5000 times more energy, the oil resources of the USA suddenly become potentially green. Also the hyper combustion ovens enable coal burning without pollution, maintaining the valued jobs of the US coal miners whilst also supporting the environment. Two birds with one stone. Tell us about these new hyper combustion technologies and their future applications in the USA and the world.
Q: Iso-telescopes, objectively have captured Other Intelligences, invisible intelligences, in our world, as ITEÕs Invisible Terrestrial Entities. Made of antimatter and even iso-material (both mater and anti-mater and moving with intelligence), observed in the Santilli telescopes.
Q: There are the implications that because we did not have the mathematics before your formulation, that we may be composed of a material state previously unknown to man, are there are developments in making isodual microscopes, that may observe the magnecular and eventually hypermagnecules within the microcosm of our biologies?
Q: Together with Dr Chris Illert you patented the hadronic space-time machines in the mid 1990s, that utilize hyperlocomotion, enabling space and time travel without violation of the laws of physics, now almost three decades since these patents were made, are there any advances towards the future development of the actual hadronic space-time machines?
Q: Is it correct that the emergence of hadronic medicine came about through an accident? One of your technicians was exposed to some magnegas residue on his hand. He had a full blown flue, and upon contact with the residue, all flue symptoms vanished. How has hadronic medicine progressed?
Other possible questions to formulate:
Q: Hadronic computing.
Q: CC: Continuous Current.
Q: Femto-technology and quasi-crystal self-assembly systems for molecular engineering. As this femto-technology has to harness the hadronic horizon, and the hadronic horizons hypertonic plane foundation, includes being the summation of every sentient and animated moment and inanimate moment of the universe(s) Ñ the quasi-crystal self-assemblies would operate upon the ÒpermissionÓ of this hadronic horizon, perhaps the source of consciousness, which would be of highest significance. How do you see the future of femto technology, and manÕs interactivity with it?
Q: the Unified Field 5th hadronic force discovery
Q: the molecular binding force as the hadronic 5th nuclear force.
Q: Harnessing the Etherino for a cosmic internet, cosmic telecommunications
Q: Bose-Einstein Condensation more exactified, and the implications on BEC in microtubules (consciousness models of Dr Hammeroff). Q different speeds of light, such as is observable in the flows of water and light propagation through various waters of different speed<
REFERENCES</p>
[1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, ``Can quantum-mechanical
description of
physical reality be considered complete?,'' Phys. Rev., vol.~47,
p. 777 (1935),
http://www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-argument.pdf
[2] R. M. Santilli, ``Isorepresentation of the Lie-isotopic SU(2) Algebra
with Application to Nuclear Physics and Local Realism," Acta Applicandae
Mathematicae Vol. 50, 177 (1998),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-27.pdf
[3] R. M. Santilli, ``Studies on the classical determinism predicted by
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen," Acta Mathematica Volume 37,
pages 5-23 (2019),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/epr-paper-ii.pdf
[4A] R. M. Santilli, ``Studies on the prediction by A. Einstein, B.
Podolsky, and N. Rosen that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,
I: Basic mathematical, physical and chemical methods
www.i-b-r.org/docs/epr-review-i.pdf
[4B] R. M. Santilli, ``Studies on the prediction by A. Einstein, B.
Podolsky, and N. Rosen that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,
II: Apparent proof of the EPR argument,"
www.i-b-r.org/docs/epr-review-ii.pdf
[4C] International workshop on Einstein determinism 2020
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/eprworkshop-2020.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/epr-paper-ii.pdf
[4D] Debate on the E PR argument, physics
http://eprdebates.org/no-universe-expansion.php<
[4E] Debate on the EPR argument, chemistry
http://eprdebates.org/general-relativity.php<
[5] N. Bohr, ``Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be
considered complete?" Phys. Rev. Vol. 48, p. 696 (1935),
www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr/EPRBohr.pdf
[6] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ``bell's Theorem" (first
published 2005, revised 2019)<
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem
[7] R. M. Santilli, ``Embedding of Lie-algebras into Lie-admissible
algebras,"
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, p. 570 (1967),
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-54.pdf
[8] R. M. Santilli, "Lie-admissible invariant representation of
irreversibility for matter and antimatter at the classical and
operator levels,"
Nuovo Cimento B 121, 443 (2006),
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs//Lie-admiss-NCB-I.pdf
[9] Richard Norman, Anil A. Bhalekar, Simone Beghella Bartoli,
Brian Buckley, Jeremy Dunning-Davies, Jan Rak, Ruggero M. Santilli
"Experimental Confirmation of the Synthesis of Neutrons and Neutroids from
a Hydrogen Gas, American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 6 (4-1), page
85-104 (2017),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/confirmation-neutron-synthesis-2017.pdf
[10] Hadronic Technologies Corporation, Directional Neutron Source,
hadronictechnologies.com/index.php/ct-menu-item-18/11-articles/19-article-10
[11] H. Ahmar, G. Amato, J. V. Kadeisvili, J. Manuel, G. West, and O.
Zogorodnia, "Additional experimenal confirmations of Santilli
isoredshift and the consequential expected absence of universe
expansion, "Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering,
Vol. 13, page 321 (2013),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/IRS-confirmations-212.pdf
[12] R. M. Santilli,Foundations of Hadronic Chemistry, with
Applications to New Clean Energies and Fuels, Kluwer Academic
Publishers (2001),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-113.pdf
Russian translation by A. K. Aringazin
http://i-b-r.org/docs/Santilli-Hadronic-Chemistry.pdf
[13] R. M. Santilli, "Theoretical prediction and experimental
verification of the new chemical species of magnecules," Hadronic J. 21,
789 (1998),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-43.pdf
[14] Y. Yang, J. V. Kadeisvili, and S. Marton, "Experimental
Confirmations of the New Chemical Species of Santilli Magnecules,"
The Open Physical Chemistry Journal Vol. 5, 1-16 (2013)
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Magnecules-2012.pdf
[15] R. M. Santilli
"An introduction to the new sciences for a new era,"
Invited paper, SIPS 2016, Hainan Island, China
Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications ol. 6, No.
1, pp. 1-119, 2017
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/new-sciences-new-era.pdf
[16] R. M. Santilli. "The novel ``Controlled Intermediate Nuclear Fusion:"
A report on its industrial realization as predicted by hadronic
mechanics," Hadronic J. Vol. 31, 1, 2008,
www.i-b-r.org/CNF-printed.pdf
[17] R. M. Santilli,
"The Novel Hyper Combustion for the Complete Combustion of Fossil Fuels",
Intern. Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, Vol. 10, No.
1, February 2019,
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/hypercombustion-2019.pdf
[18] R. M. Santilli,
"Apparent Experimental Confirmation of Pseudoprotons and
their Application to New Clean Nuclear Energies,"
International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics
Volume 9, Number 2, April 2019,
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/pseudoproton-verification-2018.pdf
[19] P. Fleming, References on antimatter galaxies as of 12/2016,
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/references-antimatter-galaxies.pdf
[20] R. M. Santilli, "The etherino and/or the Neutrino Hypothesis?" Found.
Phys. {\bf 37}, p. 670 (2007),
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/EtherinoFoundPhys.pdf
[21] R. M. Santilli, "A structure model of the elementary charge,"
Hadronic Journal Vol. 4, page 770 (1981),
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-03.pdf
[22] R. M. Santilli, Hadronic Mathematics, Mechanics and
Chemistry,,
Volumes I to V, International Academic Press, (2008),
www.i-b-r.org/Hadronic-Mechanics.htm
[23] Gandzha and J. Kadeisvili, New Sciences for a New Era:
Mathematical, Physical and Chemical Discoveries of Ruggero Maria
Santilli,
Sankata Printing Press, Nepal (2011),
www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/RMS.pdf
[24] R. M. Santilli, "Perche' lo spazio e' rigido" (Why space is rigid),
Il Pungolo Verde, Campobasso, Italuy (1956),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-49.pdf
[25] B. Davvaz, B. M. Santilli, and T. Vougiouklis, ``Studies of
Multi-Valued Hyperstructures for the Characterization of
Matter-Antimatter Systems and their Extension,Õ in Proceedings of the
2011 International Conference on Lie-admissible Formulations for
Irreversible Processes, C. Corda, editor, Kathmandu University, Nepal,
2011, pages 45-57,
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/Hyperstructures.pdf
[26] R. M. Santilli and D. D. Shillady, ``A new isochemical model of the
hydrogen molecule," Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 24, pages 943-956
(1999),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-135.pdf
[27] R. M. Santilli and D. D. Shillady, ``A new isochemical model of the
water molecule," Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 25, 173-183 (2000),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-39.pdf
[28] J.Dunning-Davies, R. Norman, *, Ruggero Maria Santilli
"A Possible Angular Quantization as a Complement to the Conventional
Radial Quantization in the Hydrogen Atom and Aqueous Systems,"
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 105-109,
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/angular-quantization-2017.pdf
[29] R. M. Santilli
"A Tentative Magnecular Model of Liquid Water with an
Explicit Attractive Force Between Water Molecules,"
Special Issue III: Foundations of Hadronic Chemistry,
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 46-52,
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-43.pdf
[30] C. R. Illert and R. M. Santilli, Foundations of Theoretical
Conciology,}Hadronic Press (1995)
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-43.pdf
[31] R.M. Santilli, Isodual Theory of Antimatter with Applications
to Antigravity, Grand
Unification and Cosmology,} Springer (2006).
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/santilli-79.pdf
[32] 1983 MUFON interview of the Santilli family for a close UFO
encounter,
www.i-b-r.org/ufo-interview.pdf
Copyright ©
1997-2007-2014 Institute for Basic Research, 35246 US 19 North # 215, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 U.S.A.
Tel: 1-727-688 3992 Fax: 1-727-934 9275 E-Mail: research(at)i-b-r(dot)org"
All Rights Reserved.