Post 52.
The Wikipedia-Google Problem in American Science:
Analysis of the R. M. Santilli and Other Articles
I am a physicist interested in the research by R. M. Santilli (see Biographical Notes, Full Curriculum, and Outline of Works, and the Scientific Awards and Nominations) because they are the only really new and advanced vistas around. I cannot publish papers in the field because my academic job would be instantly slashed, as it was the case for other dissident scientists. According to the Lawsuit Pleadings, as well as comments circulating in the academic community, Santilli filed the lawsuit because of his conviction that the unprovoked attacks he suffered for years from Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp had been commissioned had been commissioned by the Editor of Wikipedia in support of the disqualification of his research in the Wikipedia Article on R. M. Santilli. I must confess that, at first, I was quite skeptic about such a conviction although the more I analyzed the Article and studied Santilli's papers I had to chance my mind. My findings are outlined below for whatever their value.

Heading
As it is well known. Wikipedia's Article begins by calling Santilli's studies as being "fringe" science following the interview by C. Weimar [1] (references in square brackets are those in the Article), and this dubbing has been stubbornly maintained by the Editors since 2007 despite corrections attempted by numerous physicists (including myself). It see,s true that Weimar's interview was commissioned because Santilli granted the interview under the condition that it would deal with his magnegas technology (see below) since, at that time (2007) he was collaborating with associates in Israel to see whether said technology could assist in Israel achieving fuel independence, (a task worth pursuing nowadays for the stability of the Middle East). By contrast, Weinar never mentioned the magnegas technology during interview [1] that to be a hostile "profile" according to the website Anti-America and anti-Israel conduct by C. Weimar. as well as according to letters of complaint pub;ished by the St. Petersburg Times (where the profile was been published). This unprovoked hostility made me curious. I had to know its motivation.

Magnecule" theory".(the emphasis on theory is mine).
The sole references reported at the time of first mentioning "magnegas and magnehydrogen" are of commercial type, such as Refs. [8][9][10]. Later on, there is the citation of one scientific reference, but for paper [15] not publish din a refereed journal. By comparison, the universally known scientific reference to the new chemical species of magnecules is the 2001 post Ph. F. monograph Foundations of Hadronic Chemistry listed in the section of Scientific Publication, such independent reviews Foundation of Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/s10698-015-9218-z (March 24, 2015 and experimental verifications such as in The Open Physical Chemistry Journal Vol. 5, 1-16 (2013). and references quoted therein. The evident disparity between the sole quotation of commercial websites versus post Ph. D. refereed publication indicates a very skillful intent by the Editor to pre-condition non-expert readers on the fact that the new chemical species of magnecules is just a "theoretical" fancy by Santilli.

Such a negative skillful presentation becomes more serious for the environment when one note the complete silence in the Article of the chemical anomalies of fuels with magnecular structure, such as the certification by the City College of New York that the magnegas flame temperature is more than double the flame temperature of any commercially available gas (see the CCNY Summary report
and the CCNY Full report). Equally missing is the chemical analysis by Analytic Laboratory that magnegas combustion exhaust have no detectable CO and no appreciable HC, (see Magnegas Combustion Exhaust), and other omissions. The evident reason for these additional omissions is that their sole quotation would unmask the editorial intent of pre-conditioning readers on the lack of existence of magnecules. In reality, the sole quantitative representation of the indicated chemical anomalies is that by Santilli via the covering hadronic chemistry. Since, apparently unlike the Wikipedia Editors, I am indeed interested in our deteriorating environment, Santilli's processing of fossil fuels into truly clean fuels is a reason of my serious interest in Santilli's research.

The new species of magnehydrogen (chemical symbol MH) is mentioned without the indication of its main characteristics, namely, under gas chromatography analyses MH is as pure hydrogen as desired, yet its specific weight measured with actual, sensitive scales is a multiple of the specific weight of H2. The primary, also omitted, reference on MH is the paper Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 177-196 (2003); Equally unquoted are the independent experimental verifications of the indicated anomalous features of MH, such as Eprida Laboratory in Atlanta, GA, Experimental verification of magnehydrogen; and the additional experimental verification published in the International Journal Hydrogen Energy Vol. 38, page 5002 (2013); no to mention the lack of quotation of at least some of independent papers in this so interesting new field. The indicated omissions are clearly intentional because the quoted scientific references are easily identifiable in the internet.negative

The above negative portraying of the new species of magnecules caused a predictable to America and its image throughout the world. Santilli was prohibited a presentation of magnehydrogen and its independent experimental verifications at NASA in Florida as well as the JPL. However, one of Santilli's collaborators, A.K. Aringazin from Kazakhstan is affiliated to the Russian Space Agency which, unlike the American counterpart, is apparently studying the new species of hydrogen due to its enhanced energy output, increased liquefaction temperature and other features. In 2006, Santilli was invited by Chinese officers to deliver a plenary lecture on his new fuels with magnecular structure at the World Summit on Environment, the Issues, held at the Hainan Island, China, see the filming of the lecture SIPS 2016 Plenary Lecture. Santilli's new fuels with magnecular structure are manifestly much needed for the increasingly alarming deterioration of our environment. Hence, Wikipedia disqualification of these new fuels without any technical argument establishes the existence at Wikipedia of serious national; let alone scientific problems to be addressed if we care of our country, hence explaining the time I have spent on this analysis.

The second paragraph of the section on Magnecule "Theory"correctly states that Santilli rejects the 20th century notion of valence because ....he cannot conceive of a manner in which two same-charged electrons can come together to cause an attractive interaction [16]. (where [16] is a reference to his CV ....). I believe this is another point that promoted Santilli to initiate law suit in U. S.and European courts because the Editors fail to indicate that he achieved the first attractive force between two same-charge valence electrons presented in details in his 2001 monograph on hadronic chemistry. An additional deplorable case is the automatic rejection for years of the quotation of the important joint with Donald D. Shillady, Full professor of Chemistry at Virginia Commonwealth University showing that the new notion pf valence with real attractive force between valence electrons represent more accurately than quantum chemistry for the hydrogen molecule Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 24, pages 943-956 (1999) and the water molecule Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 25, 173-183 (2000). What is rather unclear to me is the reason for seemingly reputable Wikipedia editors to suppress such basic information for years, in an encyclopedia which is self-advertised as being "free."

An additional evidence causing serious damage to the credibility of the Wikipedia Editors of Santilli's Article is that they have systematically refused to quote United States Patent Number 9,700,870, B2, July 1, 2017 on Santilli Magnecules. In fact there was a suggestion in the "Talk" section of the Article summarizing the patent and suggesting its listing with no avail. Systematically, "all" listing of Santilli patent in the HHO section by various scientists were automatically trashed. This insufficiency, alone, amply justifies all allegations against the Editors of Santilli's Article. including the allegation of commissioning slander against Santilli to Frank Israel who passed to his associate Pepijin van Erp at the Dutch Skeptic Society. In fact, the very listing of Santilli's patent on magnecules would would disqualify the entire presentation, since, as one can see, the patent was granted after a rather vast experimental verification on the existence of magnecules.

The portraying in Article of a clear dismissal of Santilli magnecules as a "fringe" "theory,"while in reality magnegas is sold on a world wide basis by Magnegas Corporation, has caused large financial damage to thousand of stockholder of MNGA stock traded at NASDAQ, as confirmed by the Scott Tadsen Affidavit Wikipedia editors have additionally caused serious financial losses to a large number of TNRG stockholders, of a href="http://ofwww.thunder-energies.com">Thunder Energies Corporation, as testified by the Thunder Energy Executive Scott Wainwright Sworn testimonial, It is up to the scientific community to ascertain what motivation prompted the Wikipedia editors to violate Wikipedia rules for the intent of disqualifying Santilli';s research without any credible technical motivation.

HHO gas
At this Point, Wikipedia's Article on Santilli becomes rather bizarre because the section is dedicated to Santilli's HHO gas without the quotation of its scientific origination in the paper Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 31, 1113 (2006)) By contrast, the HHO gas is presented via J. M. 's criticism of Santilli's HHO. \This is skillfully done to portray, on one side, the impression of reporting the gas while, on the other side, pre-conditioning non-expert visitors that the gas is fake science. This clear ,manipulation of scientific information becomes more serious when noting the lack of quotation of the independent experimental verifications of the HHO gas, such as the known verification at the Eprida Laboratory in Atlanta, GA, Experimental verification of magnehydrogen and the additional experimental verification published in the International Journal Hydrogen Energy Vol. 38, page 5002 (2013).

When entering into details, the clearly intentional scientific misrepresentation by Wikipedia Editors becomes rather serious. I regret to agree with a number of MNGA stockholders that Calo's criticism of Santilli's HHO gas was commissioned by Wikipedia Editors and and skillfully because:
      1. Calo is an "engineer," thus not being qualified to express any judgment of a new chemical species requiring technical knowledge of new mathematics and chemistry beyond Calo's comprehension;
      2. Santilli's paper is entirely , that is, reporting measurements o the new gas by independent laboratories. As such, the sole credible criticisms has to be done via counter-measurements;
      3. Following a river of what amount to be insults completely without any technical foundation, Calo intentionally avoid the quotation of the anomalies of the HHO gas, such as the melting of bricks at contact with the HHO flame for the very evident reason that such a quotation would unveil the Wikipedia-Calo scheme scheme since there is no possibility whatsoever that a stochiometric mixture of H and O could melt bricks at contact. Santilli presented a "tentative" interpretation via his magnecular structure due to the weaker bond of H and O with ensuing increase flame temperature as it has been independently established for the magnegas (seer above).

This HHO section crosses all limits of decency at the quotation the quotation of the illiterate blogger Pepijin van Erp, who never did any graduate studies at all, by jointly lifting him to the notoriety needed for credibility ( see Wikimedia Article on Pepjin van Erp!. thus causing the collapse of any credibility by the editors since they do not quote that can Erp is a liar, see Lying and Cheating of Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel. and do not quote Pepijin van Erp Thrown Out of a Chess Tournament for Cheating. and other qualifications available in the internet.

The Wikipedia have gone quite low in using Pepijin van Erp as a primary voice for the dismissal of Santilli's discoveries since it is well known that this particular blog for over decade in the websites http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/02/the-continuing-stupidity-of-ruggero-santilli/
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/articles/finding-jerdsey-v-kadeisvili-or-mailing-withruggero-m-santilli
https://kloptdatwel.nl/search_gcse/?q=Ruggero%20Santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/11/sued-by-ruggero-santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/08/santilli-shenanigans
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl
and in their translations in Dutch, French, German and Italian, attacked Santilli for over a decade with dubbing such as
"the continuing stupidity...."
"mad professor"
"cunning artist"
"crank"
"junk scientist "
"fringe"
"pyramid scheme company"
" fraud"
"antisemitic"
"pseudo scientist"
"liar"
"fabricating his own awards"
all this, without any provocation against a senior U. S. Scientist, the author of some 325 post Ph. D. papers, 20 monographs, the founder of two publicly traded companies that have provided an income to a considerable number of families, the recipient of a large number of honors, including the 2009 Scientific Mediterranean Prize, being knighted a first time with the title of Sir in 2011 Republic of San Marino, and then being knighted a second time by the President of Italy, Sergio Mattarella. see the list of Scientific Awards and Nominations

Wikipedia Editors Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, Mark Bernstein and their associates have abandoned all boundaries of decency by providing an anchor to their associates Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp website Wikipedia gave illegal anchor to Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp slanderous websites. In fact, as testified buy internet experts during the Lawsuit Pleadings The "sole" possibility for the websites http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/02/the-continuing-stupidity-of-ruggero-santilli/
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/articles/finding-jerdsey-v-kadeisvili-or-mailing-with ruggero-m-santilli
and others to appear year after year immediately following Wikipedia Article on Santilli is that the indicated Wikipedia editors have authorized the indicated anchor which, in turn, is solely possible under the approval and, in this case, complicity by Google. thus establishing the existence in the United States of America of a serious Wikipedia-Google problem which is threatening the country in its most vital function, freedom of qualified scientific expression for blatantly unethical deeds. The clear evidence of the Wikipedia-Google "scientific crime" is provided by the fact verifiable by all that the above slanderous website receive very few visitors compared to the large number of visitors of the Santilli websites appearing below, hence in blatant violation of Google's rules.

Conspiracy theories and lawsuits
This section too is skillfully manipulated by the editors to portray the appearance of proper reporting, but only to non-experts in Santilli's research. As an example, the section carefully avoids mentioning the fact that Santilli was knighted with the title of Sir in 2011 by the Republic of San with the membership in the historical Equestrian Order of Sant'Agata, let alone not mentioning the more recent award of being knighted buy the President of Italy Sergio Mattarella with the highest Italian scientific award, the Star of Italy, and other awards, see the l Scientific Awards and Nominations

The comments in thios section on J. V. Kadeisvili are bizarr to say the least because of the doubdt expressed bt the blogger van Erp on Kadeisvili's existence. The facts documented in the lawsuit (I am told) arte the following: van Erp contacted Kadeisvili with harsh language requesting his CV; Kadeisvili requested van Erp CV as a condition for the release of his CV; van Ep could not release his DV because it did not and does not exist; Therefore, Kadeisvili refused to send him his CV. The fake characterf oif van Erp is easily seen from the fact that Kaderisvili's scientific CV has always been available in the internet, see . The problem for Wikipedia is that van Erp was thrown out of an international chess groupo for cheating ttp://polarbearspalaver.blogspot.com/2012/10/cheater-no18-pepijn-van-erp.html has the very poor rep;utation of being http://pepijnvanerp.blogspot.com/2016/06/Pepijn-Van-Erp.html has been sued by Santilli in U. S. Civilian Court and is about to be used iubn a Europoean Crimicval Court, etc. The disput originated from teh fact that van Erp cintacted Kadeiscvili requesting his CV. Kadeisvili rejected the request because of van Erp poor repiutation as well as the fact that van Erp is not a scientist and has no CV. The space dedicatyed to the case by Wikipedia is suspicious becauyse Kadeivili scientific CV has alweays been available in the internel following a simple searcvh http://www.i-b-r.org/J-v-Kadeisvili-CV-01-25-14.pdf Kadeiscvikli dies on on January 16, 2014 abd rge eylogt was delivered by Santilli in the lecture http://www.world-lecture-series.org/advances-in-the-lie-santilli-isotheory. Thus, the emphasis on this case granted by the Editors of Santilli's Article fuels the allegation thar te disputre was intentionally fabbriucated to discredit Santilli for which reason Santilli sued van Erp. I believe that the credibility of the Wikipedia Editors and their academic associates is seriousl;y damaged by granting resolutory power to a blogger such as van Erp while jointly avoiding the quoitation of serious spources.

Santilli's awards